prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study
  Preuzmi
PDF 1.31 MB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study
Clinical Oral Investigations, 28 (2024), 1; 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
Miletić, Ivana; Baraba, Anja; Krmek, Silvana Jukić; Perić, Tamara; Marković, Dejan; Basso, Matteo; Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin; Kemaloglu, Hande; Turkun, Lezize Sebnem

Citirajte ovaj rad

Miletić, I., Baraba, A., Krmek, S. J., Perić, T., Marković, D., Basso, M. ... Turkun, L. S. (2024). Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28. (1). doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić, Ivana, et al. "Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study." Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 28, br. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić, Ivana, Anja Baraba, Silvana Jukić Krmek, Tamara Perić, Dejan Marković, Matteo Basso, Cigdem Atalayin Ozkaya, Hande Kemaloglu i Lezize Sebnem Turkun. "Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study." Clinical Oral Investigations 28, br. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić, I., et al. (2024) 'Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study', Clinical Oral Investigations, 28(1). doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić I, Baraba A, Krmek SJ, Perić T, Marković D, Basso M, i sur.. Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study. Clinical Oral Investigations [Internet]. 20.01.2024. [pristupljeno 30.12.2024.];28(1). doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

I. Miletić, et al., "Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study", Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 28, br. 1, Siječanj 2024. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:744520. [Citirano: 30.12.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:744520
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study
AutorIvana Miletić
AutorAnja Baraba
AutorSilvana Jukić Krmek
AutorTamara Perić
AutorDejan Marković
AutorMatteo Basso
AutorCigdem Atalayin Ozkaya
AutorHande Kemaloglu
AutorLezize Sebnem Turkun
Autorova ustanova(Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb)
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Zagrebu
Stomatološki fakultet
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Dentalna medicina
Sažetak (engleski)
To evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system and a nano-hybrid resin composite in moderate to large two-surface class II cavities.Materials and methods This study was carried out by dental schools in Zagreb, Croatia; Izmir, Turkey; Belgrade, Serbia; and Milan, Italy. A total of 180 patients requiring two class-II two-surface restorations in the molars of the same jaw were recruited. The teeth were randomly restored with either a nano-hybrid resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) or a glass-hybrid material (EQUIA Forte, GC). During the 5-year follow-up, two calibrated evaluators at each centre scored the restorations annually using the FDI-2 scoring system. The survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using non-parametric matched pair tests (p < 0.05).Results There were no statistically significant differences between the overall survival and success rates of the two types of restorations (p>0.05). The success rates (FDI-2 scores 1-3) for EQUIA Forte were 81.9% (average annual failure rate: 3.9%) and 90.7% for Tetric EvoCeram (average annual failure rate: 1.9%). The survival rates (FDI-2 scores 1-4) for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram were 94.5% and 94.4%, respectively, with an average annual failure rate of 1.1%.Conclusions In terms of success and survival rates, both the glass-hybrid restorative system and the nano-hybrid resin composite have been shown to perform satisfactorily.Clinical relevance The results of this study indicate that EQUIA Forte can be one of the therapeutic options for moderate to large two-surface class II restorations of posterior teeth.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaClinical Oral Investigations
Brojčani podacivol. 28, br. 1, 104
e-ISSN1436-3771
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:127:744520
Datum objave publikacije2024-01-20
URL dokumentahttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2024-07-01 10:31:28