prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study
  Download
PDF 1.31 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study
Clinical Oral Investigations, 28 (2024), 1; 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
Miletić, Ivana; Baraba, Anja; Krmek, Silvana Jukić; Perić, Tamara; Marković, Dejan; Basso, Matteo; Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin; Kemaloglu, Hande; Turkun, Lezize Sebnem

Cite this document

Miletić, I., Baraba, A., Krmek, S. J., Perić, T., Marković, D., Basso, M. ... Turkun, L. S. (2024). Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28. (1). doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić, Ivana, et al. "Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study." Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 28, no. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić, Ivana, Anja Baraba, Silvana Jukić Krmek, Tamara Perić, Dejan Marković, Matteo Basso, Cigdem Atalayin Ozkaya, Hande Kemaloglu and Lezize Sebnem Turkun. "Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study." Clinical Oral Investigations 28, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić, I., et al. (2024) 'Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study', Clinical Oral Investigations, 28(1). doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

Miletić I, Baraba A, Krmek SJ, Perić T, Marković D, Basso M, and sur.. Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study. Clinical Oral Investigations [Internet]. 2024 January 20 [cited 2024 December 14];28(1). doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y

I. Miletić, et al., "Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study", Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 28, no. 1, January 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:744520. [Accessed: 14 December 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study
AuthorIvana Miletić
AuthorAnja Baraba
AuthorSilvana Jukić Krmek
AuthorTamara Perić
AuthorDejan Marković
AuthorMatteo Basso
AuthorCigdem Atalayin Ozkaya
AuthorHande Kemaloglu
AuthorLezize Sebnem Turkun
Author's institution(Zagreb University Hispital Center)
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Dental Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Dental Medicine
Abstract (english)
To evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system and a nano-hybrid resin composite in moderate to large two-surface class II cavities.Materials and methods This study was carried out by dental schools in Zagreb, Croatia; Izmir, Turkey; Belgrade, Serbia; and Milan, Italy. A total of 180 patients requiring two class-II two-surface restorations in the molars of the same jaw were recruited. The teeth were randomly restored with either a nano-hybrid resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) or a glass-hybrid material (EQUIA Forte, GC). During the 5-year follow-up, two calibrated evaluators at each centre scored the restorations annually using the FDI-2 scoring system. The survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using non-parametric matched pair tests (p < 0.05).Results There were no statistically significant differences between the overall survival and success rates of the two types of restorations (p>0.05). The success rates (FDI-2 scores 1-3) for EQUIA Forte were 81.9% (average annual failure rate: 3.9%) and 90.7% for Tetric EvoCeram (average annual failure rate: 1.9%). The survival rates (FDI-2 scores 1-4) for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram were 94.5% and 94.4%, respectively, with an average annual failure rate of 1.1%.Conclusions In terms of success and survival rates, both the glass-hybrid restorative system and the nano-hybrid resin composite have been shown to perform satisfactorily.Clinical relevance The results of this study indicate that EQUIA Forte can be one of the therapeutic options for moderate to large two-surface class II restorations of posterior teeth.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleClinical Oral Investigations
Numberingvol. 28, no. 1, 104
e-ISSN1436-3771
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:127:744520
Publication2024-01-20
Document URLhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-024-05491-y
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-07-01 10:31:28