Effect of Varying Working Distances between Sandblasting Device and Composite Substrate Surface on the Repair Bond Strength

Scientific paper - Original scientific paper

• Author: Phoebe Burrer
• Author: Amanda Costermani
• Author: Matej Par
• Author: Thomas Attin
• Author: Tobias T. Tauböck
• Author's institution: University of Zagreb; School of Dental Medicine
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE; Dental Medicine; Endodonics and Restorative Dentistry

Abstract (english)

This study investigates the effect of defined working distances between the tip of a sandblasting device and a resin composite surface on the composite–composite repair bond strength. Resin composite specimens (Ceram.x Spectra ST (HV); Dentsply Sirona, Konstanz, Germany) were aged by thermal cycling (5000 cycles, 5–55 °C) and one week of water storage. Mechanical surface conditioning of the substrate surfaces was performed by sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles (50 µm, 3 bar, 10 s) from varying working distances of 1, 5, 10, and 15 mm. Specimens were then silanized and restored by application of an adhesive system and repair composite material (Ceram.x Spectra ST (HV)). In the negative control group, no mechanical surface pretreatment or silanization was performed. Directly applied inherent increments served as the positive control group (n = 8). After thermal cycling of all groups, microtensile repair bond strength was assessed, and surfaces were additionally characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The negative control group reached the significantly lowest microtensile bond strength of all groups. No significant differences in repair bond strength were observed within the groups with varying sandblasting distances. Composite surfaces sandblasted from a distance of 1 mm or 5 mm showed no difference in repair bond strength compared to the positive control group, whereas distances of 10 or 15 mm revealed significantly higher repair bond strengths than the inherent incremental bond strength (positive control group). In conclusion, all sandblasted test groups achieved similar or higher repair bond strength than the inherent incremental bond strength, indicating that irrespective of the employed working distance between the sandblasting device and the composite substrate surface, repair restorations can be successfully performed.

• Keywords (english): composite repair; aluminum oxide sandblasting; working distance; microtensile bond strength
• Language: english
• Publication type: Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
• Publication status: Published
• Peer review: Peer review - international
• Publication version: Published version
• Journal title: Materials
• Numbering: vol. 14, no. 7, 1621
• e-ISSN: 1996-1944
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071621
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:127:391389
• Publication: 2021-03-26
• Document URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/7/1621
• Type of resource: Text
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2022-11-10 11:07:33