prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
  Download
PDF 1.97 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
Medicina, 60 (2023), 1; 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010017
Čelebic, Asja; Kovačić, Ines; Petričević, Nikola; Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser; Topić, Jolanda; Junaković, Luka; Peršić-Kiršić, Sanja

Cite this document

Čelebic, A., Kovačić, I., Petričević, N., Alhajj, M. N., Topić, J., Junaković, L. & Peršić Kiršić, S. (2023). Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina, 60. (1). doi: 10.3390/medicina60010017

Čelebic, Asja, et al. "Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial." Medicina, vol. 60, no. 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010017

Čelebic, Asja, Ines Kovačić, Nikola Petričević, Mohammed Nasser Alhajj, Jolanda Topić, Luka Junaković and Sanja Peršić Kiršić. "Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial." Medicina 60, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010017

Čelebic, A., et al. (2023) 'Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial', Medicina, 60(1). doi: 10.3390/medicina60010017

Čelebic A, Kovačić I, Petričević N, Alhajj MN, Topić J, Junaković L, and sur.. Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina [Internet]. 2023 December 21 [cited 2024 November 27];60(1). doi: 10.3390/medicina60010017

A. Čelebic, et al., "Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial", Medicina, vol. 60, no. 1, December 2023. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:940348. [Accessed: 27 November 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
AuthorAsja Čelebic
AuthorInes Kovačić
AuthorNikola Petričević
AuthorMohammed Nasser Alhajj
AuthorJolanda Topić
AuthorLuka Junaković
AuthorSanja Peršić-Kiršić
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Dental Medicine
(Department of Removable Prosthodontics)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Dental Medicine
Prosthetic Dentistry
Abstract (english)
Background and Objectives: Due to a lack of long-term clinical studies that would clarify whether the insertion of three mini-implants (MDIs) can be as successful treatment as the insertion of four MDIs for the retention of mandibular overdentures (ODs), this 5-year prospective cohort study was set up. Materials and Methods: Participants (n = 83) randomly received either four or three MDIs and a mandibular OD. Clinical examinations were performed at the baseline, as well as after one, three, and five years, respectively. A total of 73 participants (38 in the four-MDI and 35 in the three-MDI groups) partook in the study. The marginal bone level change, success and survival rates, and prosthodontic maintenance were assessed. Results: Repeated measures showed that the mean peri-implant bone loss increased progressively at a small amount over five years in both groups (four-MDI group = −0.36 ± 0.74; three-MDI group = −0.33 ± 0.27 mm; p < 0.05). However, an ANCOVA revealed no significant effects of the group (no significant difference between the three- and the four-MDI groups; F = 0.085; p = 0.771), gender (F = 0.023; p = 0.88), or covariate age (F = 1.95; p = 0.167) on the dependent variable: the 5-year MBL change. The success rate (together with successful survival) was 93.8% in the four-MDI group and 91.7% in the three-MDI group. The log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test revealed no significant differences between them (X2 = 0.373; p = 0.541). Conclusions: In patients with narrow ridges, the insertion of three MDIs in the mandible for overdenture retention can be equally as successful as the insertion of four MDIs.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleMedicina
Numberingvol. 60, no. 1, 17
e-ISSN1648-9144
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010017
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:127:940348
Publication2023-12-21
Document URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/1/17
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) icon
Created on2024-02-15 08:06:05